I realized that I had not read anything about India having or buying strategic bombers. This is very critical when she shares borders with two of her enemies, Pakistan and China, of whom, the latter has approximately 15 Xian H-6K strategic bombers with talk about some day building a stealth strategic bomber.
This is very critical because strategic bombers are extremely powerful and can do a huge amount of damage in just one run. A cell of three strategic bombers can do almost as much damage in one run as a wing of fighter/bombers. With India having her western and northern borders occupied by Pakistan and China respectively, India should have at least 50 to 100 strategic bombers (two to four wings). With such bombers, she could quickly reduce the most critical targets in Pakistan to rubble and be able to turn most of her attention towards fighting China, which is a must.
India only has two big short comings when fighting China right now. The first is that she doesn't have strategic bombers. The second is that she only has about 15 to 20 subs and is building another 15 to 20 subs, while China has 60 to 70 subs but India does have a good anti-sub program.
India is working on making up the difference with subs but really needs to make up the difference and pass China in strategic bombers. As a matter of fact, she could use one to two wings of her strategic bombers for anti submarine warfare and more than make up the difference on subs.
India has a number of islands in the Indian Ocean with aircraft on them that, if she based just one or two wings of long range strategic bombers on them, it would be a huge force multiplier that would give her a significant advantage in controlling the Indian Ocean. With another 20 to 30 subs and at least 50 to 100 strategic bombers, preferably 200, she would be classified a super power and be significantly ahead of China in military capability. Just two wings, about 50 planes, would give her one wing for a land war and one wing to help control the Indian Ocean.
So I went out and did some research and could only find that she ordered 4 Russian Tu-22M3 long range bombers in July 2016.
What I did find out is that India only wants to lease the Tu-22M3 strategic bombers from Russia because India is having similar technical problems with the Russian fighter planes China is having with her planes. India purchased about 30 Russian fighter planes and 7 crashed because of technical problems within months, which is why she is replacing her Russian fighter planes with European and US fighter planes.
If India leases the strategic bombers, then Russia will be responsible for repairs and parts, plus a crashed bomber would be Russia's loss and not India's loss but Russia doesn't want that deal.
This also tells me that Russia's planes are significantly better than China's but not as dependable as US and European planes, which is very important to know.
This is a really huge hole in India's weapons capabilities and must be filled before she can properly fight China alone, much less China and Pakistan together.
BTW, the US just cut the Pakistan military aid from $255 million to $100 million.
One big advantage India has on both China and Pakistan is that India's economy is strong and China's and Pakistan's economies are in trouble so they are both cutting back on military spending while India is increasing military spending in big ways. Plus India controlling the Indian Ocean would significantly decrease China's ability to get gas and oil.
Also, has anyone else noticed that India has a huge number of military cargo planes, you know, for making massive military airlifts of troops and equipment over the mountains and behind Chinese troops? Why does she need so many military cargo planes to move troops around a relatively small nation, size wise, like India?
Yeah, she has a lot of troops but she also has a lot of cargo planes.
Remember that I told you that I was watching the Sterett-Dewey Surface Action Group (Sterett-Dewey SAG - Destroyer Squadron 31 or DESRON 31)?
I just found out that it has been designated as being part of the USS Carl Vinson CSG or Carrier Strike Group BUT they are currently sailing in the South China Sea area playing island games with the Chicom. Basically, they replaced the USS Makin Island, which just returned to San Diego but they can be called to join the USS Carl Vinson CSG at any time and are only days away.
These are very powerful missile destroyers which pack a very big punch which significantly increases the fire power of the Carl Vinson CSG, so keep an eye on them.
I just got this from Newsmax by Erick Mack:
"The USS Nimitz is joining U.S. warships USS Carl Vinson and USS Ronald Reagan in the western Pacific amid warnings against North Korea's ballistic missile and nuclear program."
The fleet is just about together and ready for action. Note that there is more fire power in this fleet than most nations have with their entire militaries.
I told you that, when the USS Ronald Reagan joined the fleet, the Nimitz wouldn't be far behind.
Upper Class Trash Con
I got this at Breitbart by Pam Key:
"Zuckerberg said, 'Every generation expands its definition of equality. Previous generations fought for the vote and civil rights, they had the New Deal and the Great Society. And now it's time for our generation to define a new social contract. We should have a society that measures progress not by economic metrics like GDP but by how many of us have a role we find meaningful.'
'We should explore ideas like universal basic income to make sure everyone has a cushion to try new ideas,' he continued. 'We're all going to change jobs and roles many times so we all need affordable childcare and healthcare that's not tied to one employer.'"
That sounds really great, doesn't it?
It sounds like he is saying that the government should give EVERYONE a basic income so you can do whatever you want with your life, you know, sitting around smoking dope and screwing.
But, what is he really saying?
He is really saying the "government", you know, you the tax payer, should give everyone a basic income so he doesn't have to pay his employees as much and can take a higher profit. It is a con where he and the rest of the upper class trash are trying to fool or con you into giving more in taxes to cover their employee overhead so they can increase their profits and get richer faster because they are very greedy.
You really have to learn to read between the lines with the greedy, power mad upper class trash and you know there are a lot of stupid people called lefties who will fall for this con by the upper class trash.
BTW, if Zuckerberg really believes what he said, why doesn't he act like a real leader and lead by example?
He is worth billions of dollars and could give a lot of young people a lot of money to do whatever they want.
But, do you think he will give his own money to help others get a start in life?
Of course not, he doesn't really mean what he said; he only wants the government to give your money to other people so he doesn't have to pay his employees enough to live on so he can increase his own profits. It is an upper class trash con.
BTW, have you noticed that Hillary is still running for president?
I told you that these evil people will never quit their wickedness, even if you beat them. She is just telling more and more lies and different lies to get elected next time because she is obsessive, compulsive power mad. She is proving me right that the only thing that will stop her evil is death.
Don't you just love the retarded crap the lefty commies are trying to use against Trump about him talking to the Russians?
Hold it, the primary job of the president is to deal with other world leaders, even our enemies, you know, like Putin. Trump talking to Russia IS.HIS.JOB!
What should the commies trying to get Trump based on Trump talking to Russia tell you?
The lefty commies don't have anything legitimate to use against Trump and are grabbing at straws and even making up straws to grab at because, if they had anything legitimate to use against Trump, they wouldn't waste their time on this retarded crap.
I find it encouraging to finally have a president the media hate and they can't find anything to use against him so they have to make up really stupid stuff.
I got this from Newsmax by staff:
"Europe 'must take its fate into its own hands' faced with a western alliance divided by Brexit and Donald Trump's presidency, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Sunday.
'The times in which we could completely depend on others are on the way out. I've experienced that in the last few days,' Merkel told a crowd at an election rally in Munich, southern Germany.
'We Europeans truly have to take our fate into our own hands,' she added.
While Germany and Europe would strive to remain on good terms with America and Britain, 'we have to fight for our own destiny', Merkel went on."
Read: "We Europeans can no longer play the US and Britain for suckers and depend on them like the parasites we love being. We must build our beloved global communist dictatorship by ourselves."
Basically, the upper class trash realize they will not get help in setting up their beloved global commie dictatorship from Britain and the US in the near future, they have regrouped, they have reorganized, and they are continuing with their wickedness, you know, just like I have been telling they would.
Yes, they will work to get their commie traitors in Britain and the US to help them regain control of Britain and the US but, until then, they will beat their dead commie global dictatorship horse by themselves. "Onward, gallant dead commie global dictatorship steed!" They won't stop their evil until after they are dead, you know, just like I have told you.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.