The US Navy and Air Force are having a little financial trouble. Their budgets have been cut back so much they can't afford to buy as many F-35s per year as previously planned so they are looking into not purchasing so many F-35s per year and beefing up the Military by buying some new, improved but less expensive F-15s, F-16s, and F-18s. They are also planning to upgrade the existing aircraft to last longer and be better.
Ah, the fall of the US brought to you by the liberals. Be sure to thank a liberal for destroying your nation.
I was wondering if they would stick to the purchase of the F-35 in such numbers and not return to better fighter planes, especially since the F-35 really isn't that great of a fighter plane and is primarily an attack plane. I am also watching to see when they will cut back on F-35 purchases and buy more F-22s, which now cost less and are better planes. I read that the F-35, which was supposed to be less expensive than the F-22, is now two to three times more expensive than the F-22 and not as good a plane. I figure that it is only a matter of time until they resume buying F-22s and Lockheed kept the tooling for the F-22 figuring the military would be back for more sooner or later.
I don't know how much good those new planes will do because the pilots in the Middle East are saying they are returning to base with undropped ordinance more often than not. U.S. House Representative Ed Royce of California, said the Obama administration has blocked seventy-five percent of the air strikes against ISIS. President Obama's instructions to the Department of Defense were very clear: "I want no civilian casualties. Zero."
You just can't fight a war that way and I have pointed out that you shouldn't even try.
Retired Air Force General David Deptula, the Air Force Weapons Officer who oversaw the planning of Operation Desert Storm, recently asked the same question I have been wondering about for years: "What is the logic of a policy that restricts the application of air power to prevent the potential of collateral damage, while assuring the certainty of the Islamic State's crimes against humanity?" There is no logic to it, it is called treason.
Basically, we kill a few civilians now to stop ISIS or ISIS continues to murder thousands of civilians until we do kill a few civilians to stop ISIS AND, the longer we wait, the more ISIS will have grown so that we will have to kill many more civilians to stop ISIS. Therefore, the sooner we kill a few civilians to stop ISIS, the fewer civilians will be killed and the better it will be for everyone. It is just an ugly reality.
The Anonymous "attacks" against ISIS are Rickrolling or putting links on the ISIS sites that send viewers to other sites like music sites.
Wow, I am so impressed with the damage they are doing to ISIS...NOT!
This is just smoke and mirrors by the upper class trash to give people a false sense of security. If they want to impress me, they have to do some real damage to the ISIS infrastructure, you know, like disrupt their cash flow, destroy communications, and things like that.
Causing them to listen to music?
I bet ISIS is terrified. (/sarc)
Oh but Anonymous just replaced an ISIS site with a Viagra ad!
Big deal, all ISIS had to do to fix it was upload the site...again.
This is placebo warfare meant to make you feel better and not real warfare. No significant strategic or tactical damage is being done.
The simple fact that Hilarious is still in the presidential race and not in prison tells you just how broke the system is. If the US system was still working at all, she would either be facing life in prison or a gallows. This is just one more proof that the liberal commie traitors own the judicial system.
I hope you also realize that all of this speculating on whether Iran is making nukes is just more smoke and mirrors. They already have nukes and are building an arsenal.
30+ years of building nukes with the help of Pakistan, North Korea, China, and Russia and they don't already have nukes?
Yeah, right, your better sell that bridge to someone else because I am not buying it.
Concerning Turkey starting a fight with Russia by shooting down the Russian plane; Turkey just blinked. End Game: Putin.
Besides, you know that Obama and Nato told Turkey to shoot the plane down in order to sucker punch Putin to starting a war with NATO but Putin isn't that stupid.
Four of the rifles used in the Paris attack were purchased from a weapons black market dealer in Germany.
So, what happened to that thingy that, if you take the guns away from law abiding citizens, there will be no gun violence? Didn't work, did it?
The bad guys will always be able to get guns so you better keep yours.
The people in other countries who permitted their corrupt governments to take their guns away from them drank too much Kool-Aid. Now they are screwed unless they buy more weapons on the black market or from the deep web.
The Italian police intercepted 800 shotguns being smuggled from Turkey to Belgium on the European black market. There is an increasing demand for weapons by the Europeans who were disarmed by their upper class trash.
With the increasing numbers of people turning against their criminal and traitorous governments, if enough of them become armed, this could turn into a shooting war.
Have you noticed that Obama keeps saying that climate change is more important and a bigger threat than ISIS?
He is using this as a lame excuse to not attack ISIS oil because, "after all, the climate is more of a threat than ISIS and, therefore, the pollution caused by the burning ISIS oil is a greater threat to us than ISIS, therefore, we dare not bomb the oil ISIS is using to create the wealth they need to keep killing."
A CIA official stated that the environment has kept us from attacking ISIS oil.
Obama's current problem is that Putin isn't buying that bridge.
You watch, what Obama will stress at this coming climate meeting is that, since the climate is a bigger threat than ISIS, then we shouldn't damage the climate by bombing the ISIS oil.
It is all smoke and mirrors to protect Obama's ISIS. Obama is the Illusionist in Chief.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.